Cannabis-Induced Catatonia in a 15-Year-Old Male: A Case Report

Introduction: Catatonia is a syndrome of primarily psychomotor disturbances most common in psychiatric mood disorders but that also rarely has been described in association with cannabis use. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old White male presented with left leg weakness, altered mental status, and chest pain, which then progressed to global weakness, minimal speech, and a fixed gaze. After ruling out organic causes of his symptoms, cannabis-induced catatonia was suspected, and the patient responded immediately and completely to lorazepam administration. Discussion(s): Cannabis-induced catatonia has been described in several case reports worldwide, with a wide range and duration of symptoms reported. There is little known about the risk factors, treatment, and prognosis of cannabis-induced catatonia. Conclusion(s): This report emphasizes the importance of clinicians maintaining a high index of suspicion to accurately diagnose and treat cannabis-induced neuropsychiatric conditions, which is especially important as the use of high-potency cannabis products in young people increases.Copyright © 2023, State Medical Society of Wisconsin. All rights reserved.

Covid-19 Booster Vaccine Related Dermatitis: A Case Study

Case Report: A 28 year old male with a past medical history of hypothyroidism and positive ANA presented to an outpatient dermatology clinic with a diffuse pruritic rash two weeks after the administration of his first Moderna COVID booster vaccine. He denied any other accompanying symptoms such as fever or chills as well as any similar rashes to prior doses of the Moderna COVID vaccine. The rash consisted of pink erythematous minimally scaly papules, thin plaques and patches involving the left and right dorsal hands, forearms, wrists, face, neck and left shoulder. The remainder of the patient's skin including the bilateral lower extremities, the eyelids, conjunctiva and oral mucosa was clear. The patient denied any similar rashes in the past. The patient denied any allergies to medications, or food or environmental allergies. He denied any notable contact allergen exposures, including to soaps, lotions, and cosmetic products. The patient also denied any significant family history or past surgical history. The patient was on Armour Thyroid for hypothyroidism and testosterone for low levels since age eighteen. The patient was started on cetirizine 10 mg once daily for the rash with minimal improvement. Autoimmune workup for the rash was notable for an elevated anti-RNP and as the patient's past medical history included Raynaud's phenomenon and ANA positivity for ten years, the patient was diagnosed with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Autoimmune conditions can often have an indolent course, where symptoms progressively develop and worsen. MCTD is an autoimmune overlap syndrome that can consist of the following three connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and polymyositis. Millions of individuals across the world are receiving COVID vaccines to protect themselves and members of their community, and it is of utmost importance that we continue to investigate adverse events. Although of low incidence, these rare effects have the ability to impact large numbers of people within both healthy and immunocompromised populations. It is critical that we examine and document them in a rigorous manner, to ensure safe vaccine delivery and reassure the public about vaccine safety overall.

A case of anaphylaxis to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a patient with confirmed polyethylene glycol allergy

Case report The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provided emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020. Implementation of COVID-19 mass vaccination efforts were implemented soon after. However, following the FDAs EUA, COVID-19 vaccine allergic reactions were reported. These findings led to concerns about vaccine hesitancy and the possible avoidance of future doses. The Texas Children's Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Hypersensitivity Clinic was established in December 2020 to help address these concerns and to evaluate both pediatric and adult patients with immediate allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines, as well as evaluating patients with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate (PS) allergy. We present the case of an 18yo female who experienced anaphylaxis following her second Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The patient developed symptoms of generalized hives, chest tightness and dyspnea 17 minutes after receiving the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. She was treated in the emergency department with IM prednisone and PO diphenhydramine. Of note, in 2018, she had a similar response to her HPV9 vaccine (containing PS 80). Tryptase wasn't obtained at the time of her COVID-19 or HPV9 vaccine reactions, but she did have a baseline that was normal around 4ng/mL. Skin testing was performed to the following: PEG 3350, PS 20 and PS 80. Skin testing (skin prick and intradermal) were negative for PS20 and PS80. PEG 3350 skin prick was negative but methylprednisone acetate (PEG 3350) was positive at the 4mg/mL intradermal testing strength. She underwent a Miralax (PEG 3350) oral challenge. Within 20 minutes of ingesting 0.17grams PEG 3350 she developed an itchy macular rash on neck and upper chest, nausea and a globus throat sensation. She was treated with PO cetirizine and symptoms improved. Tryptase level was obtained 30 min after the start of her reaction and was 4ng/mL. Given the patient's reaction, she was advised to avoid PEG containing products and will return to undergo a graded-step challenge to the Janssen (J&J) COVID-19 vaccine. The prevalence of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine anaphylaxis and PEG allergies is rare. However, allergy referral is warranted in cases of immediate reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine or history of PEG or polysorbate allergies.

Exacerbation of psoriasis vulgaris induced by vaccine COVID-19 in HIV patient: a case report

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic and inflammatory skin disease. Many triggering factors can cause exacerbation of psoriasis, such as infection, trauma, and drugs. Several vaccines are known to cause new lesions or exacerbation of psoriasis, including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), influenza, tetanus-diphtheria, and pneumococcal polysaccharide. In the COVID-19 pandemic, the COVID-19 vaccine is known to cause the appearance of new lesions or exacerbation of psoriasis. Case presentation: A woman, 31 years old, came to the clinic with itchy reddish patches with white scales on her face, chest, stomach, back, arms, and both legs, and increased since 2 weeks ago. Previously, the patient got the first COVID-19 vaccine (Sinovac), and three days later, red patches appeared with white scales on the chest, stomach, and back. The patient had been diagnosed with psoriasis 3 years ago. Dermatology examination showed reddish patches with white scales on the face, chest, stomach, back, arms, and both legs. Auspitz sign and Kaarvetsvlek phenomen were positive. PASI score was 9,2. Dermoscopy examination showed red dot distribution on light pink background and white scales. She was treated with desoximetasone cream 0,05% twice a day and cetirizine tablet 10 mg once a day. After 2 months of therapy, reddish patches were decreased, and the PASI score was 6,9. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine can cause exacerbations in psoriasis patients, but this vaccine can still be given to psoriasis patients. It is based on the documented efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in the prevention of severe COVID-19 infection and fatality. Psoriasis patients should be consulted before getting vaccinated for COVID-19, and prompt clinical visits should be available if exacerbation develops.

Safety profile of CoviShield (ChAdOx1nCoV-19) vaccine among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital

Background: Coronavirus 2019 was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Bereft of specific treatment for the disease, vaccinations and COVID appropriate behavior have come to be the main approaches to combat the pandemic. A number of vaccines have been approved after clearing clinical trials. Hence, it is essential to evaluate the safety profile of each vaccine for ensuring optimum health of the general population. This study was conducted to evaluate the adverse events following CoviShield vaccination in a tertiary care center. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the pattern of adverse effects, treatment given, and comorbidities seen in healthcare workers (HCW) who reported to the adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring center in the department of pharmacology Government T.D. Medical College, Alappuzha, following CoviShield vaccination from January 2021 to October 2021. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective and descriptive study was carried out at Department of Pharmacology, GTDMCA involving all HCW who reported side effects following CoviShield vaccination in the ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in the Department of Pharmacology, GTDMCA from January 2021 to Oct 2021. Result(s): Out of 620 HCWs who reported adverse event following vaccination, majority (45%) were from the age group 21-30 years. About 83% of HCWs who reported adverse effect were women. Majority of the respondents (96%) experienced the adverse effects within 24 h. About 88% of respondents experienced these adverse effects after the initial dose alone. Commonly encountered adverse effects were fever (57%), headache (43%), myalgia (38%) etc. Hypertension (7%) was the most common comorbidity seen. Majority of the beneficiaries (70%) took paracetamol for the treatment of the adverse effect. Conclusion(s): Majority of the vaccinated HCWs experienced minor and self-limiting adverse event following immunization (AEFI) with Chimpanzee Adenovirus Oxford novel CoronaVirus-19. No serious AEFI were reported to the AMC. Despite the record speed at which the vaccine has been developed, it has shown to have a good safety profile considering the millions of doses that have been administered.Copyright © 2023 Sai Nathan R, et al.

Delayed-Onset Urticaria Following Vaccination for COVID-19

Background: As COVID-19 vaccines continue to be administered worldwide, there are an increasing number of studies documenting cutaneous reactions following vaccination. Systemic reactions, such as urticarial diseases, occur. Purpose(s): The main objective of this study was to investigate the association between urticaria and recent vaccination for COVID-19. Method(s): A retrospective chart review examining the association of urticaria and COVID vaccination was conducted. Result(s): We report 17 patients who developed an urticarial reaction following vaccination against COVID and one patient who developed an urticarial reaction following a COVID infection. The vast majority of the patients were women with a mean age of 42.8 years. Conclusion(s): Cutaneous manifestations often follow COVID vaccination and infection. It may be helpful to inquire about recent infections and vaccinations in patients presenting with urticarial diseases. Copyright © 2022 Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery.

Duodenal Stricture as a Rare, Possible Complication of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease (Egid)

EGID is a recently described condition with an unknown etiology and pathogenesis. There are three case reports of duodenal stricture associated with EGID: one in an adult requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy due to the suspicion of malignancy and 2 cases in a child and a young adult, who responded to oral steroids. We report the case of a 10-year-old who presented to A&E with a 9-month history of epigastric abdominal pain and 1 episode of haematemesis, on a background of asthma. He was treated for Helicobacter pylori, based on a positive stool antigen. Abdominal pain and vomiting persisted, therefore an oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) was performed. This identified widespread white plaques throughout the oesophagus, erythema and nodularity of the gastric antrum and white nodules in the first part of the duodenum. Histology revealed changes of EGID and eosinophilic oesophagitis (EOE) and patient was commenced on Montelukast, oral viscous Budesonide (OVB), Cetirizine and continued proton pump inhibitor (PPI). After the allergy workup identified house dust mites, cat sensitisation and fish allergy, a 6-food elimination diet was initiated. During the next 2 years, symptoms subsided, and endoscopy changes improved, with only mild signs of active EOE while on OVB, PPI and diary/egg/fish free diet. However, the patient relapsed due to poor compliance to treatment. He became more unwell during the Covid pandemic with recurrent vomiting and static weight. A trial of dupilumab was considered, however his reassessment OGD had to be delayed due to restricted access to theatre. He was treated empirically with a reducing course of oral prednisolone, with temporary response. The endoscopic assessment performed subsequently showed erythema, erosions and white plaques in the distal oesophagus and gastric antrum with narrowing between the first and the second part of the duodenum (D2), that could not be entered. Histology identified mild upper oesophagitis (4 eosinophils (eos)/HPF), active middle and lower oesophagitis (20 eos/HPF and 12 eos/HPF, respectively), chronic gastritis (80 eos/HPF) and nonspecific reactive changes of the proximal duodenum. A barium meal confirmed a duodenal stricture. At this stage, we recommended a sloppy diet and a second weaning course of oral prednisolone, along with Montelukast. He was subsequently commenced on azathioprine for maintenance of remission. A repeat barium study and small bowel MRI performed post course of steroids and on azathioprine revealed stable appearances of the proximal duodenal stricture, excluding the presence of further strictures. While the patient has responded to the course of oral steroids and azathioprine, a repeat upper GI endoscopy is currently planned to dilate the duodenal stricture. The challenges posed by this case were the rarity of the condition, limited treatment options and access to endoscopy during the Covid pandemic and the fact that unlike previous case reports a sustained remission could not be obtained on steroids, and a maintenance immunosuppressive medication was required. We can conclude that this subgroup of patients should be monitored closely for signs of bowel obstruction and will require more intense treatment, including immunomodulators, endoscopic dilatation and or surgery.

Evaluation of Some Quality Parameters of Five brands of Cetirizine Hydrochloride Tablets Marketed in Abuja, Nigeria

Cetirizine Hydrochloride is a non-drowsy second-generation antihistamine and a derivative of piperazine with a half-life of eleven hours. It is used to relieve allergy symptoms such as runny nose, sneezing, rhinitis, urticaria and watery eyes. It is a key adjuvant therapy in management of some covid-19 related symptoms. To assess the quality of five brands of Cetirizine hydrochloride 10mg tablets marketed in Abuja. The weight variation, friability, hardness, disintegration, dissolution tests and HPLC assay were evaluated using USP methods. The hardness and friability of the samples ranged from 2.03kgF to 7.54KgF and 0.00 to 0.90% respectively. The disintegration time were within 5mins, for dissolution, 80.0 to 103.3% of the API in the samples were released within 30mins, the assay ranged from 93.1 to 101.6%. The cetirizine tablets conformed with quality standards. Copyright © 2007 The authors.

A Cross Sectional Survey on Self-Medication Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic among the General Population in India

Background: Self-medication(SM) trend has been reported to have increased worldwide due to a surge in the internet usage particularly during and after the pandemic. This global trend has posed a great challenge for clinical practice more so as there was a rise in the availability of new and repurposed pharmaceuticals. Objective: 1) To assess the prevalence and pattern of SM during covid-19 pandemic among the general population. 2) To determine demographic variables and adverse events associated with SM. 3) To evaluate the drugs commonly used. Materials and Methods: This pre-validated questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between July 2021 to September 2021 on 400 subjects of the general population. The categorical variables were represented using frequencies and percentages. The chi-squares test used to see the statistical significant level and binary logistic regression were performed to determine the probable factors associated with SM practice. Results: The study showed a prevalence of self-medication as 83% during Covid-19. There was also a significant increase in self-medication practice during the COVID-19 pandemic due to anxiousness (68.7%) among respondents. According to our results, 93% of respondents had heard about SM through pharmacist, the media, family, friends. Most commonly used drug was paracetamol primarily used for fever (76.2%).2.7% of respondents reported adverse events. SM practices were more among the females and employed individuals. Conclusion: The study revealed the there was increase in the practice of SM during Covid time which was due to panic and anxiousness driven by wide media coverage on COVID 19, lockdown, restricted availability of medicines. This study has shown that there is a need for continued awareness and education about the risks of Self-medication.

The Role of Cetirizine in the Changing Landscape of IV Antihistamines: A Narrative Review.

Since 1955, the only available H1 antihistamines for intravenous administration have been first-generation formulations and, of those, only intravenously administered (IV) diphenhydramine is still approved in the USA. Orally administered cetirizine hydrochloride, a second-generation H1 antihistamine, has been safely used over-the-counter for many years. In 2019, IV cetirizine was approved for the treatment of acute urticaria. In light of this approval, this narrative review discusses the changing landscape of IV antihistamines for the treatment of histamine-mediated conditions. Specifically, IV antihistamines will be discussed as a treatment option for acute urticaria and angioedema, as premedication to prevent infusion reactions related to anticancer agents and other biologics, and as an adjunct treatment for anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions. Before the development of IV cetirizine, randomized controlled trials of IV antihistamines for these indications were lacking. Three randomized controlled trials have been conducted with IV cetirizine versus IV diphenhydramine in the ambulatory care setting. A phase 3 trial of IV cetirizine 10 mg versus IV diphenhydramine 50 mg was conducted in 262 adults who presented to the urgent care/emergency department with acute urticaria requiring antihistamines. For the primary efficacy endpoint, defined as change from baseline in a 2-h patient-rated pruritus score, non-inferiority of IV cetirizine to IV diphenhydramine was demonstrated (score - 1.6 vs - 1.5, respectively; 95% CI - 0.1, 0.3). Compared with IV diphenhydramine, IV cetirizine demonstrated fewer adverse effects including less sedation, a significantly shorter length of stay in the treatment center, and fewer returns to the treatment center at 24 and 48 h. Similar findings were demonstrated in another phase 2 acute urticaria trial and in a phase 2 trial assessing IV cetirizine for pretreatment for infusion reactions in the oncology/immunology setting. IV cetirizine is associated with similar patient outcomes, fewer adverse effects, and increased treatment center efficiency than IV diphenhydramine.

Review of paediatric food challenges: Could more almond and tuna challenges be safely performed at home?

Background: Clinicians use serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and/or skin prick test (SPT) to help decide whether a child is suitable for a food challenge. Performing a food challenge (FC) or supervised feed (SF) is the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of type 1 food allergy. Food challenges are labour intensive and our unit currently has long waiting lists for food challenges, exacerbated by the COVID 19 pandemic. This study aims to determine if the current thresholds for home introduction can be altered. Method: Retrospective data analysis of tuna and almond challenges performed in the Paediatric Allergy Service at St George's Hospital. Electronic medical records were reviewed of all patients who underwent an oral food challenge between April 2018 to October 2020 at St George's Hospital. Clinical history, results of SPT and specific IgE to tuna and almond and the outcome of the challenge were extracted from the hospital database. Results: Tuna 14 children underwent a tuna food challenge. None were observed to have a positive result. One child had an inconclusive challenge as the final sample was refused;prior to this the child did not experience any signs of an allergy reaction. All these children had a known allergy to other fish. Almond 77 children underwent an almond only challenge;8% (6) of these were supervised feeds, the other 92% (71) were food challenges. 8% (6) children were observed to have a positive almond challenge. One child had an inconclusive challenge as the final sample was refused;prior to this the child did not experience any signs of an allergy reaction. 50% (3) of children with a positive challenge were managed with cetirizine alone, at the correct dosage for age. The other 3 children complained of mild symptoms which resolved with no treatment. Conclusion: No children had a positive tuna challenge and the thresholds for home introduction of tune could be reviewed and relaxed. 96% of children who had an SPT less than 2mm tolerated the almond challenge. For those that reacted, all reactions observed were mild to moderate. The threshold for home introduction of almond could also be reviewed and relaxed.